I was surfing the web and saw this:
“If the women refuse to breed & care nothing for their tribe then you have to find new ones. That is the way it has always been. East Asians are starting to do this, maybe its time European men explore such an option.
Admixture isn't ideal, but history shows it can work thru men.”
It was a comment in response to a graph that showed the total fertility rate of women in Spain from 1850-2020. It highlighted the part where the fertility rate showed a slight increase during Franco’s dictatorship. From 1939-1975.
Now I understand the women live completely in a social body. Influenced by their fathers, brothers, sons, friend, etc.
Compared to men, women are hardwired to conform to men. A biological survival trait. Their are many cases of women marrying men outside of their race/culture and adopting culture of their husband. It’s the reason why during wars men are always killed first. Men won’t conform and will attempt to overthrow the foreign army. Women won’t necessarily have the same drive to overthrow their captives. If the women get pregnant from their captives they have a biological impulse to take care of the child and nurture it. Many female mammals are like this.
See lions e.g. Whenever new male lions want to expand territory they kill the Cubs that are not their own. And take the lionesses. Lionesses attempt to stop the killing of their Cubs but ultimately they can’t. This forces the lionesses to enter heat again and the cycle of life starts again with the new pride and her conquerors.
This is why children with Asian fathers and white mothers are more Asian than children with white fathers and Asian mothers. The will of the father is inherited and passed on by the father not the mother. This can be applied to most mixed race families.
If the success of nations/tribes/races depends mostly on Men how much of this attributed to race and genetics.
Any good books?
“If the women refuse to breed & care nothing for their tribe then you have to find new ones. That is the way it has always been. East Asians are starting to do this, maybe its time European men explore such an option.
Admixture isn't ideal, but history shows it can work thru men.”
It was a comment in response to a graph that showed the total fertility rate of women in Spain from 1850-2020. It highlighted the part where the fertility rate showed a slight increase during Franco’s dictatorship. From 1939-1975.
Now I understand the women live completely in a social body. Influenced by their fathers, brothers, sons, friend, etc.
Compared to men, women are hardwired to conform to men. A biological survival trait. Their are many cases of women marrying men outside of their race/culture and adopting culture of their husband. It’s the reason why during wars men are always killed first. Men won’t conform and will attempt to overthrow the foreign army. Women won’t necessarily have the same drive to overthrow their captives. If the women get pregnant from their captives they have a biological impulse to take care of the child and nurture it. Many female mammals are like this.
See lions e.g. Whenever new male lions want to expand territory they kill the Cubs that are not their own. And take the lionesses. Lionesses attempt to stop the killing of their Cubs but ultimately they can’t. This forces the lionesses to enter heat again and the cycle of life starts again with the new pride and her conquerors.
This is why children with Asian fathers and white mothers are more Asian than children with white fathers and Asian mothers. The will of the father is inherited and passed on by the father not the mother. This can be applied to most mixed race families.
If the success of nations/tribes/races depends mostly on Men how much of this attributed to race and genetics.
Any good books?
