>>12792184No there will literally ever be a satisfying answer because it's so complex even with as much reductionism applied we could only get some really enormous system of very complex and accurate complex complex differential equations that if someone asked that question we could give those exact equations and they would not fucking understand and not be satisfied.
and it'll just be reduced to something like
>>12792207and still be unsatisfying because it wasn't something like
>hey dad why is there a moonand you say
>because gravity son, or something stupid like that and he says
>ohand you're all happy until your divorce and suicide and he resents his mother forever because of your suicide and they have a terrible relationship she doesn't give a shit about all her boyfriends beating her son because she's a vapid whore then he becomes the second hitler or something stupid.
at this point everyone is tired of the jews so he actually succeeds.
Or whatever WWII was about.
Anyways.
I actually think it's not that hard.
We just need to study cells and reduce them to differential systems and then reduce them into cellular automata and describe them as a system fo cells.
Actually that all sounds really hard even as an over simplification.
