>>12791604Boing aint going anywhere in the next few decades, if you are a value investor, maybe it's decent I don't really know.
> Most of them are great innovative companies and Starship destroying launch prices is opening the industry back upI've seen so many go under though, it's all about funding and cashburn. Based Bigelow is kill, that asteroid mining company got bought by a fucking crypto ico who then public domained all their IP lol.
This is a perpetual thing -> big dreams, raise funds, burn it all, close shop.
That said I don't disagree with the premise at all and think it's on point, if you have a medium term outlook definitely go investing into stocks that will benefit greatly from lower launch costs, and note that's not always space startups. Things like Blacksky already turn a profit at current costs and likely face serious sovereign risk in the future. I'd focus on things that can't afford to get orbital access right now.
Also join the mumble you tards.
> 192.53.170.32