>>12783710I wasn't asking for your own empirical small sample size you know, it means little.
Because from mine it doesn't specifically make sense, mine at least comes from the organisation of a societal system. As a boy I was really interested in art and naturally talented too. I begged my mom to go to art school and finally got into one at 6, teacher was a smoking no-life that just told us to draw random shit. Only other students there were girls so I felt like quite an outsider. I tried 2 different ones but all were the same. When I got older I planned to check an actual art school out, all I saw were still terrible creations that focused on sensing expression instead of intuitive and real beauty.
Modern swedish art schools was a mistake. Now it seems to me that most boys in art focus on either functional art (webart, architecture, etc) or gruesome schizo art while girls focus on chaotic expressive, often feminist gruesomely sexual art.
I wanted to treat art like a craft, didn't get to in any mentorship I tried to find, it was all about the lie of subjectivity.
