>>12779638>it's not few lines of code, commercial models have at least few thousands lines of codeSo? I dont even know what a line of code is but the last one ive seen seemed as if it took one 2 mins to write it. Anyhow it is infinitely more simple than a surgery
> that are then trained over few months on huge GPU clusters and this is just the beginning,You dont need humans for that and even if you did it doesnt sound like something an actually intelligent individual would choose do. And in case you dont know surgeons also have to read about complex operations for months before performing them (ben carson,craniopagus twins) and that AFTER having learned medicine for over a decade.
>if you think it's easier for a human to learn every possible outcome of a surgery in their limited time with as few errors as possible than it is to for a robot developed over years by top researchers in both AI I think its easier to make an AI learn how to code itself and learn from its own mistakes than it would be to teach it how each individual's brain's structure looks like and where the tumors/anneurysms are located,let alone how to remove them on a case by case basis. You are the one who is disposable here buddy.
>instantenious decision making, more computional power used to train it than your brain will ever generateAt that point it would surpass you and all the millions of codemonkeys as well dumbass. If you think what you are doing is more intricate than neurosurgery or cardiovascular surgery you are insane...actually you are right,surgery is simple,we only need a BA (4 years of college?) to perform it...oh wait thats software engineering
