>>12775728>That's a negative claim. Are you actually this retarded?No, if you claim a thing is bullshit, it is exactly a positive claim that the thing is false. It is not equivalent to saying you have doubt or are unconvinced about that thing.
>Attempting to shift the burden of proof doesn't work, get over it.More empty rhetoric, still no source.
>Doesn't follow. My claims are rejections of claims that someone else made and failed to substantiate.No, you made two claims and failed to substantiate either.
>It's eviscerated that neither you nor anyone else are going to substantiate these claims, even though you have the burden of proof. Therefore they're bullshit.No, you made two claims. The burden of proof for those claims is on you and only you.
>Where did I claim that?Do you not know the meaning of the word "bullshit"? That would certainly explain your failure of logic.
>What stupidity?Citing a chimpout as if it were evidence for your claims about the permutated affects of microplastics and climate change on the poor and rich.
>All you've done is attempt to shift the burden of proof.No, I've simply asked you to substantiate your claims, and you've failed miserably.
Keep trying, it just makes you look more desperate.
>More empty rhetoric, still no source. 
