>>12772059>>12772090Because they don't want equality. It never was about being equal.
A simple example: Where guys need to shed tons of tears/sweat/blood to reach the top of the corporate ladder, a woman should be given a red carpet to the top under the guise of "we need more women at C-level ranks because diversity".
But the moment you start suggesting that a woman should put in as much effort as a guy would need to, you get called a sexist and get canceled into nothingness.
There is simply no way to go up against this without losing everything you've built in a single day.
This is an extremely toxic environment on all levels
Funny thing is their are loads of women who actually DID put in the effort and reached extreme heights without needing "equality". Lisa Su is a perfect example. She studied EE and did R&D work at IBM when IBM was synonymous with PC. That's a fucking impressive feat no matter the gender or race.
And now she's saving AMD and beating Intel at their own game.
But women don't want that, they want it all to be handed to them on a silver platter.
Women want the same privileges as men, without all the hardships men experience. And the only way for that to be possible is for men to do all the work and women reaping the rewards.
"Equality"
