>>12766873>fake Moon landingsB8 but I’ll bite.
How is it NASA somehow faked the moon landings yet many people on ham radios could listen in the entire time from a source found on the moon?
http://www.arrl.org/eavesdropping-on-apollo-11 (Also has embedded source links)
And if these landings were faked, then how come the Soviet Union never called them out on it? They would be the first ones who would parade their rivals faking a major space feat especially when they’re in the middle of a Cold War with the U.S.
The fake moon landing idea has huge gaping holes that hoaxers can’t fill, ironically your lemming infograph perfectly represents people who blindly accept these conspiracy theories at face value when they tend to fall apart under scrutiny
>>12766503Because we can actually land on Mars and build infrastructure there, Venus needs a couple hundred years of heavy space based terraforming just to bring the heat+pressure down to tolerable levels for landing
