>>12766053>nice guys are submissive>literally the definitionNice insight, retard.
>>12765986You don't get a good answer from either men or women about this, because it operates on a subconscious level, and the net result is simply "oh, s/he's hot", or "s/he's not my type".
This main invisible factor is the social hierarchy, and sexual attractiveness is through a socially transmitted dominance hierarchy, and the male is required to be socially higher up on the totem-pole than the woman. This power imbalance is absolutely required for sexual attractiveness in men, and it subordinates every other factor.
So that if David Beckham sleeps with a woman, and then calls her incessantly the next day, asking how she is doing, then, no matter how attractive he was to begin with, he loses all attractiveness completely. The reason is that he is demonstrating a neediness for companionship which is inconsistent with a powerful social position. Likewise, paying too much attention or giving too much respect to what a woman is saying will lower the man's relative position, and thereby diminish his attractiveness. This is why feminism is necessary, to correct the imbalance of power which comes from letting these retarded sex-games run amok.
Conversely, if an ugly guy dominates a bunch of hot guys socially, then this guy is by definition more attractive, period, and he is paradoxically even more attractive than if he were good looking. This is because by dominating the sexy dudes, he is flaunting his display of social skills, thereby demonstrating his ability to rise up the social hierarchy even with the handicap of being ugly. The euphamism for this is "sense of humor" and "nice personality", two things that really mean "can dominate a social gathering, producing admiration and subservience in others". These are the most important factors, they are strongly sexually selected in humans. It is probably through this absurdly powerful sexual selection that we evolved brains.
