>>12760949> as in selective information presentation to population members because of known preferences or habits in order to maximize social cohesion is a valid hypothesis.exactly what I think is tearing social cohesion apart. This is Pavlovian reinforcement learning coupled with information siloing, leading to extremist opinion in both camps as they do not balance each other out or hold room for compromise- the synthetic factor that 'updates' a persons interpreter and introduces new degrees of freedom. The only cohesive force is the boot on each persons brain. As extremism bubbles in each silo, a subset of intuitive individuals will observe the restriction of information flow and become nihilistic and cynical. Flat earth? why not, maybe its a pyramid.. History? yeah right look at all these things our narrative cannot describe.
>How does an authority inform others in such a way that their return trip to the authority yields more than if they had done it alone without said authority having to do a song and dance about it and with minimal argumentation?I only believe in the authority of ones own mind, authority over others is delusion in my eyes. But, trying to sympathize with your idea, you go Aldous Huxley instead of Orwell, make so many narratives possible that each one is meaningless, the mosaic of narratives your chattel, i mean, audience, choose to subscribe gives the picture you require
