Global warming (and cooling) as a cycle
No.12760294 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>12761579 >>12761640 >>12761790 >>12764242 >>12764716
So we know the earth is slowly getting warmer, and that humans have (at worst) sped it up and (at best) have done nothing to stop it.
We also know that a volume of water in a vacuum will “boil until it freezes.” We know, also, that earth has had both extremely hot periods (giant arthropods, a fuck load of plants, lots of oxygen) and extremely cold periods (everything is frozen). For the most part it is theorized a meteor or a volcano is the cause for why it became so cold so suddenly, but perhaps it’s the phenomena of boiling until frozen?
Is there any reason NOT to believe that the earth gets hot and cold in cyclical periods of millennia? Everything else in the damn universe is cyclical on some level, so why has science been so adversely against the idea that the planet heats and cools cyclically?
We also know that a volume of water in a vacuum will “boil until it freezes.” We know, also, that earth has had both extremely hot periods (giant arthropods, a fuck load of plants, lots of oxygen) and extremely cold periods (everything is frozen). For the most part it is theorized a meteor or a volcano is the cause for why it became so cold so suddenly, but perhaps it’s the phenomena of boiling until frozen?
Is there any reason NOT to believe that the earth gets hot and cold in cyclical periods of millennia? Everything else in the damn universe is cyclical on some level, so why has science been so adversely against the idea that the planet heats and cools cyclically?
