>>12749082This claim can't be refuted. It lacks premise, a first and a middle term, it's just a conclusion.
As an example, imagine that i just told you
"God is a trans woman". My claim wouldn't be refutable because of the same reasons.
Now suppose that instead of just asking you to refute the claim "God is a trans woman" i had asked you to refute "God is a person and all trans women are persons, therefore god is a trans woman"
In this way, my argument could be refuted because you could point out that my second term is wrong, because clearly there exists people who aren't trans woman.
