>>12748705no its not wtf. 6 books on proofs logic and set theory before you start learning arithmetic? are you retarded? By the time you get to "basic mathematics" you're gonna have picked up the rest of the chart by osmosis, but its very inefficient. A more proper intro would be
>>12748131Intro:
Basic Mathematics
1 intro to proofs book. How to prove it/Book of proof are good
Intermediate:
Analysis 1 Tao
Linear Algebra by Strang
Vector Calc Hubbard & Hubbard
Analysis 2 Tao
Stats/probabillity book of your choice
Advanced:
Some easy Number theory book (might not be neccessary if you worked well in the early stages)
Artin Algebra
Measure Theory by Tao
Topology Munkres
In general though, whether a book is good comes down to idiosyncrasies of your own, like whether you like the writing style, how tenacious you are, and so you probably wanna look at the pdf of a couple books for each stage, just to see which book you like the best, and also maybe look at some reviews online.
