>>12747737IIRC Tegmark says its just how information just feels to be processed "internally". But that is a bad angle to approach it from, because information objectively is just an abstract notion. We have to deal with concretes here:
Subjectivity is simply a fundamental aspect of all physical fields, but outside animals it never gets organised so coherently that a feeling can be generated. Elementary subjectivity is the internal perspective of a wavefunction. You can't separate these two concepts, just like you can't separate the concept of a cube having an interior. You can only perceive the solid exterior of the cube, and the interior always by sheer logical necessity exists as the cube exists, trivially solid, but also if it's just an empty vacuum. It's still the interior, otherwise you don't have a cube. Two very different natures but ultimately one single thing.
Actual perception is a strange dynamic: the external representation of wavefunction dynamics are collected and processed by brains for purely pragmatic Darwinist systems, but the orchestration results in subjective consciousness. It's like an eye looking at itself (without mirror).
