>>12745049imagine getting it so completely wrong but still writing up all that crap in a self congratulatory manner
>it's cute you think there's even an argumentyes, and the main point of the image from
>>12744795 is to expose hypocrisy and double standards when it comes to submitting to authority (the dimorphism depicted is that of authority of the state vs authority of an ideal).
to cement this, an image of people actually and literally licking boots is placed next to the comic.
so much to the meaning of the image.
now to your fallacious "interpretation"
>First is the assumption that anyone left of /pol/ is an anarchistno one said that and nothing in the image says that, that belief is entirely your projection.
the image directly mocks anarchists as they are referenced by their insignia, the image doesnt actively classify anyone as anarchist however.
the people in the right side of the image are merely a prop to show that this practice happens not just figuratively in reality.
>the largest is simply that mainstream liberal ideology is about as far removed from anarchism as possibleyour claim, your belief.
this has little to do with the topic and the image doesnt comment on this divide at all.
you are off the mark with this.
>the meme is a butthurt reaction to being called a bootlickerno, not at all and not even remotely close to the truth.
>this has nothing to do with actually licking bootsthe picture directly depicts this and even if it is supposed to imply as a meta message the literal meaning still holds true.
>if that if there's any group that probably has negative power and authority it's definitely blacks... and thats exactly the purpose behind these boot licking actions.
the sentiment of that is however not the primary idea for the comic, this serves just for illustration purposes.
>still love licking boots?a question to me? why? we are discussing the meaning now why do you feel the urge to let yourself down to ad hominems?
