>>12743755>So mathlet it isYou are retarded
>Let me give you a hintDon't bother, your lack of knowledge of IQ won't be helpful to anyone
>standard deviation does not follow from the meanNobody every made that claim, you are now resorting to making stuff up because you realized you straight up lost a debate.
>I can, in fact, change either of these values to whatever numbers I wish.No you can't, IQ tests are constructed with a standard deviation size of 15. Changing the standard deviation size to 30 just makes it a nonsense number that has nothing to do with IQ scores.
>And I already told you how to change the std in my previous message.No you didn't
>15 is in no way related to the number 100Nobody claimed that, you are demonstrating either severe brain damage or intentionally resorting to deception because you know you lost a debate. Both of which are utterly shameful.
>I could just as well define my IQ test to have a mean of -14 and a standard deviation of 88.Except that's not how IQ tests are constructed, so doing that would just give you a nonsense number that has nothing to do with actual IQ tests.
>Now go awayIt's time for you to leave this board forever. You just don't know enough about this stuff.
>I'm fine with midwits, but my tolerance for retards is very limited.You are retarded
Let me summarize what happened in this little interaction:
>I point out that the average IQ is not 120, therefore calling 120 IQ midwit is wrong>your response is that midwit actually means someone who is above average but can't be considered smart>I rebut this by stating that PhD and MD's have an average IQ of 125, therefore if you wish to stay consistent on your previous failure of an argument, you would now have to claim that PhD's and MD's can't be considered smart>your response: "but wut if u change the IQ tests so that OP's picture would be right anyway??? just change the numbers lol!"You have been completely and utterly blown the fuck out.
