>>12738433>Maths is nothing but a languageIdiotic statement. Maths is nothing like a language. Mathematicians typically use english to write math.
>It's all in your head, it has nothing to do with realityAgain wrong. Math was invented to deal with quantities in reality.
Math is used everyday to predict things in reality.
>>12738456>axioms based on real life observations that are common for everyoneThe axioms that are currently in place for mathematics have nothing to do with real life observation. Nor are they common for everyone: there are a lot of people who deny the axiom of choice, because it conflicts with other intuitions (e.g. Ron Maimon).
>>12738611>If math is discovered, then why do mathematicians name theorems after themselves?To let others know they discovered it.
>If math is invented, then it's post hoc descriptions of things we already understand and knowDoesn't follow.
>So both the invention and discovery of math yield contradictionsIt doesn't. You're just dumb.
>>12738703Similarly, every piece of writing is simply a discovery of an element in {A,....,z}^N, and every statue is a discovery of what lies inside a marble block.
It's an amusing thought, but ultimately untenable. The invention/discovery dichotomy is real, just hard to define.
>>12738715Axioms are discovered, just like theorems. It's not like Zermelo just randomly thought up a bunch of statements out of nowhere and imposed a law that everyone will now accept them. Axioms are supposed to be "natural" and believable.
Axioms are just as much discovered as theorems.
>>12738425Most of pure maths has 0 empirical consequences.
>>12738332>how to be sureYou never will.