>>12739727New anon here.
Let us take what we know. That when we measure a property of a particle, we some seemingly random measurement. The distribution of probabilities for the possible measurements we get can be calculate using mathematics.
What does this mean? Is the particle literally undergoing a random process (COPEnhagen)? Does it have a defined single state even when its not measured and we are just not able to predict what its state will be when we measure it (Bohmian mechanics or some deterministic model of QM or superdeterminism)? Or are several universes created at each branching point, such that every possible branch exists (many worlds)?
Well, all three of these possibilities would provide an explanation for why measurements seem to return random results.
A large proportion of physicists (polled by some researchers a while back) favor the copenhagen interpretation, since it is the simplest interpretation. Deterministic QM models are relatively compelling as well, since it doesn't leave some obscure "physics random generator" that is undefined. I assume the small proportion of many world interpretationists think that it explains why vastly improbable events like the formation of life occur, and why physics "constants" (not really constants) have the values they do.
From this point of view, MWI is compelling. If you assume that the chance of life occurring by chance is almost 0, then copenhagen and deterministic models are unlikely to be try given that life exists; whereas MWI is practically guaranteed to produce life.
This is simply my humble brainlet opinion
