>>12738344Your pic seems rather silly
1.Of course people should follow the system that gives them money, security and happiness. Why wouldn't anyone want these things? Are you implying that there is something more useful and objective in the world that they should strive for? What are some of these "high ideals"
2.Why do you assume the person will be complacent all the time? Every generation the standard increases anyways for these things. If anything, it's easier to keep people oppressed by not giving them enough resources as they will too busy and too tired at work to actually focus on higher thinking (Our ancestors didn't have time to think about philosophy because they were too busy trying to not starve).
3."The system" can't possibly a monolith as it takes too many people for that sort of control (they control the education, politics and media and whatever). This sounds all nice on paper but entirely infeasible in reality.
4.You still haven't explained what these supposedly "higher ideals" promise. Just that it will remove security and economic power from the person. Obviously they wouldn't support you.
5.People aren't ignoring your "higher ideals" because you have no power. They don't follow it because you still haven't explained what these higher ideals do.
6."The person stops trusting the system when it stops being able to provide for them." Obviously that's a clear sign that the system isn't working. Why would they complain about a system that is benefiting everyone?
7.You still haven't explained what is wrong with this made up system. You can get anything you want from it and can just use your free time to research other things instead of losing your security over vaguely explained things.
>8.A lot of people are against this so called system. Where does this random 90% come from when human nature makes people want to be different/have an identity (example:(you))?9.You can just call everything you don't like propaganda. It's a buzzword.