>>12702013Here are some points in which you are retarded.
1. The natural numbers are not infinite, that's absurd. They're very finite. The collection of all possible natural numbers, however, is not finite, i.e. infinite.
2. Cantor was wrong about many things, for example the definiteness of the continuum problem as well as his naive definition of a set which brought about a miriad of contradiction.
3. Finitists don't believe the largest natural number exists. That's absurd. You can always add 1. Just because you don't think "the set of all natural numbers" is a valid mathematical object which you can manipulate to your fancies doesn't mean you don't understand the potential infinite.
4. Infinity DOES NOT exist in any empirical form. When we talk about infinity we don't have any referrent besides the abstract ideal image in our heads, whereas when we talk about finite things we can easily construct referrents using computers and algorithms, so that our claims become falsifiable and related to reality. Claims about infinity are NOT about anything empirical.
