>>12698368Yes, I believe that society will eventually come to accept it. First off, we're far from the days were the social sciences were dominated by literal communists (Gould, Lewontin). Not so long ago, in the 70s, even milquetoast evolutionary psychologists like Dawkins were decried as fascists ; proponents of the link between genes and behavior, such as EO Wilson or Arthur Jensen, were routinely assaulted and received death threats. Nowadays, communism is dead and leftist sociology is relegated to irrelevant comparative literature departments, while psychometrics and evolutionary psychology are firmly entrenched academic disciplines.
Second, the progress in genetics will inevitably produce results identifying intelligence-boosting genes (in fact it has already started). Once we have identified those genes, it will be painfully obvious that they will be unequally distributed between individuals, and even between groups (ethnic groups, social classes, etc.)
Thirdly, China. China, unlike the west, don't suffer from negrolatry, and are pushing full steam ahead in their eugenic efforts to boost intelligence. If they ever deliver results, there will inevitably be an arms race to boost IQ, which can lead to two solutions: either the West abandons its egalitarian ideology and joins the race, or it persists in it and will get overtaken by China. In either case, the eugenic view will prevail.
