>>12689175>BLMHas nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics, which is fine, it's her opinion:
>Akshually what about Muh Race, Muh I.Q., Muh Statistics, Muh blah blah blahNone of that is accepted in mainstream science, the stats probably exist but nobody (who matters) attributes them to /pol/-tier causes. Besides, she's on twatter, is a woman, and would get canceled for not "using her platform" otherwise. Yeah, you might think that makes her weak but again, she's a woman, is a normie, and probably supported it anyway.
>she believes in climate-changeUnless your a demigod like Dyson (pbuh) you can't really question that, it's our best theory as scientists in that area, just like evolution is in biology. I mean honestly, you're the one who sounds anti-science rn.
She has a nice video where she explains how we can predict climate change but not the weather and what it means to predict that something will occur in a chaotic environment.
You should look it up and watch it, it's pretty good.
