It is undeniable that the jews have made great contributions to mathematics. Grothendieck, Erdos, Perelman, Cantor and so many others were Jews.
I've seen some nazis claim that the Jews have a very different style of doing mathematics.
Bieberbach wrote
>"… the spatial imagination is a characteristic of the Germanic races, while pure logical reasoning has a richer development among Romanic and Hebraic races. … In the intellectual sphere the race shows in the manner of creation, the evaluation of the results, and I guess also in the standpoint considering foundational questions. … Formalism wants to build a realm of mathematical truths which is independent of man, whereas Intuitionism is based on the idea that mathematical thinking is a human endeavor and thus cannot be separated from man."
Teichmuller wrote
>But I know that many academic courses, especially the differential and integral calculus, have at the same time educative value, inducting the pupil not only to a conceptual world but also to a different frame of mind. But since the latter depends very substantially on the racial composition of the individual, it follows that a German student should not be allowed to be trained by a Jewish teacher.
I personally don't find them to be true. Just from looking at a piece of mathematics, I don't think I would be able to tell if a jew came up with it. But perhaps that's because I'm not experienced enough.
Do you agree with them? If so, can you give any specifics about how jewish mathematics is different?
To me, their overrepresentation in mathematics and their great contribution is a very convincing proof that they do indeed have greater intelligence on average, and I find no evidence of a specific style of mathematics that is more suited to jews which could be a potential explanation why they're overrepresented even though they don't have greater intelligence than goyim.
I've seen some nazis claim that the Jews have a very different style of doing mathematics.
Bieberbach wrote
>"… the spatial imagination is a characteristic of the Germanic races, while pure logical reasoning has a richer development among Romanic and Hebraic races. … In the intellectual sphere the race shows in the manner of creation, the evaluation of the results, and I guess also in the standpoint considering foundational questions. … Formalism wants to build a realm of mathematical truths which is independent of man, whereas Intuitionism is based on the idea that mathematical thinking is a human endeavor and thus cannot be separated from man."
Teichmuller wrote
>But I know that many academic courses, especially the differential and integral calculus, have at the same time educative value, inducting the pupil not only to a conceptual world but also to a different frame of mind. But since the latter depends very substantially on the racial composition of the individual, it follows that a German student should not be allowed to be trained by a Jewish teacher.
I personally don't find them to be true. Just from looking at a piece of mathematics, I don't think I would be able to tell if a jew came up with it. But perhaps that's because I'm not experienced enough.
Do you agree with them? If so, can you give any specifics about how jewish mathematics is different?
To me, their overrepresentation in mathematics and their great contribution is a very convincing proof that they do indeed have greater intelligence on average, and I find no evidence of a specific style of mathematics that is more suited to jews which could be a potential explanation why they're overrepresented even though they don't have greater intelligence than goyim.
