>>12664583nigger please learn how light and lenses work, you sound schizo as fuck too, and if not then you're probably a bot or like 14 or something.
> Basically we need a usual telescope, with the exact same azimuth and elevation and at least two of „his“ telescopes. In order to determine, what are the linse, light and other effects.You should be dismissing the paper outright because it doesn't specify any of these things other than dumbass is using a single concave lens. Its just not a functional system for any sort of long distance measurement. Concave lenses make things far away appear smaller however if your object gets very close to or on the lens, it will instead be magnified.
Also LOL he's misattributing camera artifacts to images from the telescope itself. Pic related, retard pseudo-scientist here literally thinks lines from shakey hands and long exposure are entities that only his concave lens telescope can see.
fuck you
