>>12647573>can you debunk this meme, /sci/?I can debunk it, since my undergrad and grad degrees are in the area of medical research.
Your picture depicts propaganda for pro-vax and anti-vax research. I wouldn't trust a news organization to give me the truth. I also wouldn't trust authors trying to make money off of fear.
I've done work in research. I would trust journals articles that publish work using methodologies I understand.
Then again, if I was a normie (read: sub140 IQ retard) with no medical research experience, I wouldn't be able to trust other researchers work.
TL;DR either you trust news sources like a retard, or trust alarmist pulp-book authors like a retard, or you trust freely accessible journal articles and determine whether their research methods are sound and then trust the results (like less of a retard than the other two).
The ideal is to literally work in the lab developing a vaccine, performing all the work yourself, then having a statistician blinded to the data analyse it. Then you check their analysis.
The OP picture does not reference actual research at all, but retard-tier pseudoresearch
