>>12644543Ofc sure those are very reasonable questions, sorry for leaving that stuff out. I’m operating under quantum fields. The ambiguity of the operations is intentional, it’s an integral part to this proof. The identity element is just the (x) which in this case actually has some implicit coefficiency.
Yes yes thats exactly what I was thinking, it gives me a lot of hope to see someone else spotted that. I’ll take your suggestions under consideration!
