/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12643165

28KiB, 353x499, ljvdkd.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 21:45:15 2021 No.12643165 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12643182

Is sakurai still the go-to text for graduate QM? Which did you end up learning from?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 2021 21:49:55 No.12643182 Report

Quoted By: >>12643360 >>12645116

>>12643165
My grad QM professor assigned two other books for the course, Gottfried and Yan and another by Isham, but you could tell his lecture notes were coming directly out of Sakurai.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 29 Jan 2021 22:32:50 No.12643360 Report

Quoted By: >>12645116

>>12643182
>Isham
Based

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 12:08:16 No.12645116 Report

Quoted By: >>12645138

>>12643182
>>12643360
For self study which do you think would be preferred?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 12:26:59 No.12645138 Report

Quoted By:

>>12645116
What book did you study QM from in the past?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO King-Size_Homer.png, 138KiB, 363x275

Anonymous Sat 30 Jan 2021 12:37:28 No.12645141 Report

Quoted By:

lol, he learns pseudoscience

he thinks he is "learning"

sad. Really sad.

Last time I read about QM axioms, they were utter shit nonsense. Let us assume Schrödingers equation.
Let us assume sinusoidal wave functions to particles.

QM book is just few integrations and stupid ass garbage like particle in a box.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches