>>12643122to the pic
>"reprehensible views"scientifically and statistically backed facts that are universally recognized as such by evolutionary biologists and geneticists, also psychologists who work on the topic
the IQ gap is well documented and is the foundation and starting point for further discussions
shameful display, those that are enlightened can see through this easily, same as academics
>Have you ever had publications or grants denied for researching the (((wrong))) topics?never have and will be as im an engineer so there is zero risk for ethical dilemmas
>How much control do wealthy financiers have over the process?significant, the money for research has to come from somewhere
scientists, no matter how smart and capable want to be paid
significant or relevant research is impossible without sponsors or being born a billionaire with "fuck you" money
