>>12637805>wildbergerHe's a respectable mathematician, and some of his work is actually connected to mainstream work in numerical analysis and computable analysis. In more conventional math terms, his denial of the real numbers basically just amounts to demanding and decidable algorithm for any claim in real analysis.
>poltardsYou seem like one of the people who calls anyone who isn't an SJW a poltard. Yes, there are actual schizos and crazy conspiracy theorists on pol, but they constitute probably <1% of the human population. Just because someone is asking questions about big tech, or big pharma, or racial and gender differences in psychology, doesn't automatically entail that they're some evil, low IQ, white nationalist Trump supporter.
People are allowed to ask questions about things they don't understand. People are allowed to question the political and scientific establishment. I myself a democratic socialist, and I have a BS in math, but I have no problem if conservatives or people who don't have a formal scientific education want to ask questions about the safety, efficacy, and cultural benefit of science and technology. In fact, a "low IQ racist Repbulican" who is asking questions and willing to listen and engage in debate and intellectual growth has a far better understanding that some low T, corporate democrat like yourself who has pink hair, eats Starbucks everyday, "trusts the experts", and supports social media censorship.
