>>12635962>Why time isn't considered a fundamental interaction?SPACE is a single thing.
SPACE is multi-dimensional.
>>12643791YES of course, all dimensions of space share a common origin point.
in the beginning big-bang singularity was the single-common-origin-point of all the multiple dimensions of space.
Turning back time & contracting space backwards to the big-bang means all those electron/positron pair-production locations located every Planck distance were all at the exact same 0.0 location.
Big-Bang is all those gazillions of gazillions electron/positron pair-production locations now at the same location erupting forth with unfathomable amounts electrons & positrons
>>12637441 >>12638239.
This universe is only the first 4-dimensions of what sprang forth from that big-bang common-origin location, so obviously the source of those electron/positron pairs was not from this universe but bled into our universe from higher-dimensions from that common-origin location-point.
>so where is this 0.0 common-location-origin of all the dimensions of space, now?That single location broke up into gazillions upon gazillions of separate electron/positron particle-pair locations
>>12637441.
The universe inflated so now, the common-origin of all the many dimensions of space is those electron/positron particle-pair production locations spaced every Planck distance
electrons and positrons continue to bleed into this universe from those higher-dimensions-of-space from this common-origin (universe is scar-material between particle-pair locations distancing) and its antimatter annihilation explosive force is the Dark-energy that is the cosmological-constant
>>12640338 >>12640403Scientists whom insist this cosmological-constant is a phenomena of only this universe have us believe the cause of universal-inflation is a free lunch. universe-inflation is work being done but we'll just call this a "constant" and leave out words like "free-energy" and "over-unity" out of it.
