>>12629409>those who are homosexuals as adults tend to be androgynous as childrenNot even trolling dude. This is legitimately one of the stupidest things I've read on /sci/. All children look like children.
>>12629360I can't give a good example that homosexuality is the cause of pedophilia, but I can explain why it's almost always men, which is likely half or more of the puzzle.
>Human females neotenous>Male sexuality physical>Certain class of males unable to distinguish neotenous females from children>PedosThis reflects why the victim's sex doesn't matter. The pedo just sees an attractive person and goes for them. This is a genetic predisposition that explains pedophilia.
HOWEVER. The other half of the puzzle is environmental. This is where those who were molested as children tend to become child molesters as adults. Since half of the children who are molested are boys (almost always by a male adult), they normalize homosexual behavior. Anyone who tells you sexuality is purely genetic is being dishonest.
As a matter of fact, I'm so confident in my hypothesis I'll make a prediction before looking up the data, and I leave it to (you) to falsify my hypothesis. If I'm right, we can use a Bayesian analysis to predict the overrepresentation of homos that were molested. Here's the numbers:
>Assume 100% of pedos are males>Assume 50% of molested children are boys>Assume on average, only 1% of male population is homosexual>Assume 3% of population are pedosThis is enough to predict the overrepresentation rate of homos who have been molested as children. I'd do if myself but I'm too lazy, and I feel it wouldn't be right if I tried to falsify my own hypothesis. The rest is up to (you).
