/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12628138

2MiB, 1182x5912, ScienceSummary_2020_December_4c.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 22:58:04 2021 No.12628138 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12628193 >>12628836 >>12633571

This has been one of the most exciting months in science so far. Anything major missing in that summary? Let's discuss recent papers & developments.
Video version: https://youtu.be/Fodnn2PePT8

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:01:22 No.12628144 Report

Quoted By: >>12628150

>53 qubits of electrons
who writes this shit?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:05:09 No.12628150 Report

Quoted By: >>12628156

>>12628144 What's your problem with that? A qubit is not the same as an electron and it does use electrons.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:07:17 No.12628156 Report

Quoted By: >>12628178

>>12628150
saying "53 qubits of electrons" implies you have 53 electrons and you're specifically manipulating them. which is not what a transmon is

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:15:18 No.12628178 Report

Quoted By: >>12628183 >>12628216

>>12628156 no, it implies that you have 53 qubits and that all of these use electrons. It doesn't specify anything about the level or type of use of these qubits. The engineers' claim was reaching quantum supremacy with it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:16:26 No.12628183 Report

Quoted By:

>>12628178
Chud

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:21:51 No.12628193 Report

Quoted By:

>>12628138
Nuke China

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:29:49 No.12628216 Report

Quoted By: >>12628245

>>12628178
wtf even is "quantum supremacy?" sounds incredibly pseud
shit like that is why no one takes qm computing seriously, it all sounds like sify mumbo jumbo

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:43:24 No.12628245 Report

Quoted By: >>12628262 >>12628312

>>12628216
>wtf even is "quantum supremacy?" sounds incredibly pseud
That's explained in the image even though I tried to keep it short.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 23:48:11 No.12628262 Report

Quoted By:

>>12628245
It still sounds retarded. But what more can you expect from physics? The jargon is especially chosen to sound convoluted and indicative of severe mental retardation.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Jan 2021 00:03:16 No.12628312 Report

Quoted By: >>12630196

>>12628245
It's like using a nuclear weapon to kill a spider (which isn't that bad for a new tech i guess)...i wouldnt call that supremacy but i think the term is problematic and derogatory for normal computers
Will the quantum AI be raciss towards normal AI? We have to stop chudtum machines now

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Initial_climate_feedbacks_(left- (...).jpg, 1MiB, 1497x2018

Anonymous Tue 26 Jan 2021 00:21:26 No.12628370 Report

Quoted By:

Does anybody know how vague / conclusive that study about chance in simulated climate feedbacks is? For instance: how much is known about the used parameters?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Jan 2021 03:35:18 No.12628836 Report

Quoted By: >>12629536

>>12628138
>micro plastics in womb
so, is this the origin of the tranny pandemic?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Animation_of_2020_SO_around_Earth.gif, 3MiB, 560x420

Anonymous Tue 26 Jan 2021 08:40:09 No.12629453 Report

Quoted By:

In case anybody is looking for links to the studies: they are in the video description.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 26 Jan 2021 09:31:53 No.12629536 Report

Quoted By:

>>12628836
maybe maybe not, who knows

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO CSIRO_ScienceImage_2337_Sunset_a (...).jpg, 2MiB, 2657x2052

Anonymous Tue 26 Jan 2021 15:02:07 No.12630196 Report

Quoted By:

>>12628312 I think it's just applicable to only a (currently very) limited area of computational problems (you can't use these for "spider" problems etc)...there's also the communications / networking aspect of it.

One thing people should understand by 2021: you can't just throw "AI" at problems to solve them or their underlying issues.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1610207356762.png, 118KiB, 800x789

Anonymous Tue 26 Jan 2021 15:23:45 No.12630241 Report

Quoted By: >>12632771

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO i fucking love science soyjak2.jpg, 42KiB, 546x241

Anonymous Tue 26 Jan 2021 22:39:19 No.12632135 Report

Quoted By: >>12632771

>Most likely source of transmission is man-made
>One of the 2 strongest candidates for ET signals

>First lunar sample since 1976 in 2020
>44 years

>First regulatory approval for a synthetic meat product
BASDE!

>animal based greenhouse gas emission strongest for animal based foods
All in accordance with the anti-meat propaganda of course

>Arecibo telescope breaks
good

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 01:27:07 No.12632771 Report

Quoted By: >>12632879 >>12634749

>>12630241
>>12632135
You’re literally on /sci/ retards

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO soy science worship religion sou (...).jpg, 154KiB, 974x878

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 02:05:19 No.12632879 Report

Quoted By: >>12632891

>>12632771

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 02:09:20 No.12632891 Report

Quoted By:

>>12632879
do people posting this realize that the right side is only remotely true for behavioral science?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 07:54:56 No.12633571 Report

Quoted By: >>12634651

>>12628138
Always appreciate these, OP. But the 53 electron qubit is badly written. Should be superconducting qubits or SQUIDs.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO quan.jpg, 895KiB, 1098x617

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:02:41 No.12634651 Report

Quoted By: >>12634715

>>12633571 Had to keep it brief. It's still correct isn't it? It would be good to have that part explained if it was added and it probably wouldn't convey much useful/relevant information to most people of the audience. It does say that there advantages and disadvantages to each of the two systems.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:24:27 No.12634715 Report

Quoted By:

>>12634651
the difference is that when people talk about these systems, they call them "superconducting qubits" and not "electron qubits." so the terminology doesn't match the common, and more accurate, term.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO wojak-soy-boy-glasses-vertical-o (...).png, 5KiB, 200x352

Anonymous Wed 27 Jan 2021 17:39:37 No.12634749 Report

Quoted By:

>>12632771
> NOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T BE ANTI-/SOI/ ON MY HECKIN /SOI/RINO!!!

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches