>>12621088Yes, Occams razor is flawed. But when you happen to stumble upon two equally plausible hypothesis and have to make a choice between one or the other, you first go with the simpler one, and if you happen to falsify it then you go with the complex one.
For example: If I have a bike, and I leave in the street for 1 hour, but when I come back it's not there, what's more plausible? That the bike grew legs and went away or that a fucking nigger stole it?
And it doesn't even work that well, in the last example: What if I simply forgot were I put it? Because your trying to measure simpleness after all, which is anything but simple
