/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12619490

17KiB, 330x499, 312V9A4mghL._SX328_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 23 Jan 21:00:48 2021 No.12619490 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12619652 >>12620225 >>12620350 >>12621896 >>12626258 >>12626293

Bayesian stats is 100% bullshit

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Jan 2021 21:08:01 No.12619521 Report

Quoted By:

t. 100% retard

El Arcón

El Arcón Sat 23 Jan 2021 21:19:02 No.12619560 Report

Quoted By:

Bayesian statistics is useful for particle collider physics.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Jan 2021 21:24:26 No.12619580 Report

Quoted By:

https://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 23 Jan 2021 21:44:23 No.12619652 Report

Quoted By:

>>12619490
>t. ass-blasted fedora

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 00:09:40 No.12620225 Report

Quoted By:

>>12619490
>100% bullshit
Which prior are you assuming?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO eliezer.jpg, 37KiB, 640x640

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 00:39:17 No.12620350 Report

Quoted By: >>12621306

>>12619490
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XTXWPQSEgoMkAupKt/an-intuitive-explanation-of-bayes-s-theorem

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 06:17:27 No.12621306 Report

Quoted By:

>>12620350
oh ok big yud explained it so it's true

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 06:36:53 No.12621342 Report

Quoted By: >>12621455 >>12623998

All probability is 1/2, it either happens or it doesn't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 07:24:19 No.12621455 Report

Quoted By: >>12621465

>>12621342
But then the probability of it being 1/2 is also 1/2.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 07:27:46 No.12621465 Report

Quoted By:

>>12621455
That's only 1/2 true.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 11:41:01 No.12621896 Report

Quoted By: >>12626214

>>12619490
based frequentist retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 11:45:11 No.12621903 Report

Quoted By:

$\hspace{0.5em}\bigtriangleup\\\bigtriangleup\bigtriangleup[\math]$

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 12:22:27 No.12621976 Report

Quoted By: >>12623996

I hold Big Yud personally responsible for this obsession over "muh bayesian good muh frequentism bad". I have never heard anyone with a degree in stats be so obsessive over this issue. It is honestly pathetic.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 22:33:15 No.12623996 Report

Quoted By:

>>12621976
nah there are small-minded bayesian partisans in academia too

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 24 Jan 2021 22:34:42 No.12623998 Report

Quoted By:

>>12621342
So the probability that something is either 1/2 or 0 is equal to 1.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 13:44:20 No.12626214 Report

Quoted By:

>>12621896
Frequentism is the only interpretation of probability that makes any sense.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 14:01:41 No.12626258 Report

Quoted By:

>>12619490
Bayesian useful for isotope analysis

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 25 Jan 2021 14:12:28 No.12626293 Report

Quoted By:

>>12619490
Bayesian stats is to frequentist stats as general relativity is to classical mechanics. Objectively superior but less intuitive and makes brainlets seethe.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches