>>12617919>Many Asians are not well off in reality since many live in poor conditions or don't attain high schooling comparable to their "race".Their home countries or US? Because the data doesn't support that.
We just look up the household income to dismantle this. Asians have the highest household income.
>pic relatedAnd yes, Asians aren't a monolith. That is not an argument. Averages don't work like that either.
If I say that on average a white household makes $65,777, that does not imply that that is the average in every state, county, town, etc, or that every white household has an income of exactly $65,777.
>and genetic potential is a meme because it's vague as fuck and completely neglects the environment that allows people to do shit.Genetic potential is the maximum level of all traits that a person is capable of attaining.
We have a genetic limit expressed in the phenotype. No amount of environmental influence can break that limit.
At some point, each person can't get any bulkier, faster, or smarter.
If you don't even know what genetic potential means, then I am doubtful you'll add anything useful.
Read what I said again.
>every population climbs up the natural hierarchy in the EXISTING SYSTEM based on their genetic potential.This is "the environment" you are talking about, and is dependent on populations. Whites in the south don't do as good as whites in states with better richer economies is not an argument. I am talking nationwide, but if you want to look at each state, we still see consistent trends in each state regardless of how hard they try and "fix" the disparity. Because it is genetic.
I also have no clue where you pulled this shit:
>Blacks are basically about close to their white Southerners peers.Just lookup the poverty rate by race for every southern state.
Here is an example, in Alabama, whites are 12.6% of those impoverished while making up 65% of the population of Alabama.
>https://www.welfareinfo.org/poverty-rate/alabama/#by-race 
