>How late is too late for policies to have a reasonable likelihood of achieving the Paris Agreement’s 2 degree goal in 2100? Assuming a moderate mitigation strategy, a 2 degree warming threshold, and accepting a 67% likelihood of remaining below the threshold, the Point of No Return will arrive in the year 2035.
>If removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere is strong, the Point of No Return gets delayed to 2042.
>With the same assumptions but a 1.5 degree warming threshold, the Point of No Return has already passed.
>Greenhouse gas removal, if implemented immediately, might push the Point of No Return to 2026.
>For a more aggressive (fast) mitigation strategy, the Points of No Return, assuming no greenhouse gases are removed from the atmosphere, will arrive in 2027 and 2045 respectively for the 1.5 degree and 2 degree targets
>If you eat the bugs then the point of no return is this, otherwise number go down. EAT. THE. HECKIN. BUGS.
>BTW the point of no return was originally between 1960- 1970. Nothing personnel kid
Climate science is literally the most retarded psychopathic cash grab discipline ever invented.
>If removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere is strong, the Point of No Return gets delayed to 2042.
>With the same assumptions but a 1.5 degree warming threshold, the Point of No Return has already passed.
>Greenhouse gas removal, if implemented immediately, might push the Point of No Return to 2026.
>For a more aggressive (fast) mitigation strategy, the Points of No Return, assuming no greenhouse gases are removed from the atmosphere, will arrive in 2027 and 2045 respectively for the 1.5 degree and 2 degree targets
>If you eat the bugs then the point of no return is this, otherwise number go down. EAT. THE. HECKIN. BUGS.
>BTW the point of no return was originally between 1960- 1970. Nothing personnel kid
Climate science is literally the most retarded psychopathic cash grab discipline ever invented.
