>>12599224these studies to not debunk the flyn effect (which is essentially the argument you are claiming to debunk). I'll quote it for you:
"The Flynn effect is the substantial and long-sustained increase in both fluid and crystallized intelligence test scores that were measured in many parts of the world over the 20th century.[1] When intelligence quotient (IQ) tests are initially standardized using a sample of test-takers, by convention the average of the test results is set to 100 and their standard deviation is set to 15 or 16 IQ points. When IQ tests are revised, they are again standardized using a new sample of test-takers, usually born more recently than the first. Again, the average result is set to 100. However, when the new test subjects take the older tests, in almost every case their average scores are significantly above 100."
meaning that iq changes over time within a given racial population. if iq is fixed to race, it would not change in a given race over a short period of time. this means that two genetically identical communities can be measured to have different iqs. and since communities are formed based on race (mainly), there is no way to compare two race's iq without also comparing two communities, which is subject to the flyn effect, so one cannot arrive at a conclusion regarding a given races iq compared to another race.
