>>12595656they are changing the definition of herd immunity.
if thats not shifting goalposts i truly dont know what is. after a decade of concentrated effort to force that into their heads.. and then to act as though it never happened. then wonder why these people are so fucking distrustful..
an analogy. flouride in drinking water is good
but it took the whistleblower suing and getting re-instated on public record for them to tell the public the truth about its use and toxicity.
dacade later the WHO says it was a "public health miricle"
the messaging is so fucked up and the irony is all the folks pushing it are comms majors working as "science communicators" the same as the "fact-checkers" however they're all innumerate or willfully ignorant, or at worst maliciously pushing an agenda..
this fucking stinks.
the newest papers having more citations than anything for the last 5 years..
the fucking typos on them..
the egregious conflicts of interest..
the destruction of the Hippocratic oath
the destruction of any academic honor pledges
>and they lick it up under the guise of helping. desperate to be published and guaranteed review and citation due to the contextual period it was published in rather than being published for the sake of its merits. but given our ability to fuck vaccinations via rushing and contamination in the past maybe youre right.. the numbers dont lie and our record has slipped a long way.
please remember polio and the like anon.. they're not all evil.. i earnestly plead of you.. for your own sake. you are all your family has to care for them, no one else gives a fuck. you have to have the correct information to help them and yourself. you must live anon..
mrna and testing periods are key in this issue..
im done.
im in fucking tears.
24 months of this and no end in sight.
i can no longer in good consience stand by my position as an enabler to the academy it has proven itself defenceless and unwilling to prevent its own corruption.
