>>12600711>How, specifically, does complexity imply intelligence?Well, dull people are incapable of complex thoughts.
Smart people are capable of understanding something complicated, even if they may prefer simplicity for the sake of their brain.
>Why do you believe that nothing complex can come from "randomness"?Because then it would be a mess. Something both big and random would be a mess.
Life would be impossible if everything were "randomly" changed all the time. Stability is required for life to blossom.
>We have perfectly reasonable naturalistic explanations for this. Unless you disagree with evolution?Reality is evolving and everchanging, yes.
The Darwinian view of evolution supposedly means survival of the fittest. Such a view is a materialistic one who encourages cowardliness, dishonor and a no-risk approach.
You are free to adopt it, regardless.
>Additionally, how do you explain defects in systems (that are consistent with the naturalistic theories) if the systems were designed intelligently?Defects are inevitable and necessary, as reality is everchanging. Science and theories will never be able to catch up with Truth.
We all have to grow and learn, hence no system can be true enough.
>Even if complexity implied intelligence, how do you know it was god and not some other intelligence that created life?God is the origin of life and creation. There cannot be another origin of all things. Either God exists or He does not.
>What is money if not a shorthand for your time and labor? Is belief that something is valuable not what gives something value?You are free to worship any material object you want.
But that is very much worshipping nothingness, an idol, hence something worthless.
Loving someone or something is a better way of living, as long as you keep in mind that everything is flawed.
A belief in God can be flawed, but that is not proof that God does not exist.
