>>12587773Of course pic is not a proof, but I want to know why this intuition that you're approximating the circumference this way is wrong, while riemann integrals are mathematically tight. It sure "seems" to get a better "fit" on every step.
I think OP'a pic, while a joke, is also a good way to tell if you have a good understanding of the fundamentals of calculus. Why are integrals tight while this only seems to approximate the circle, but really doesn't?
