>>12586804The schizo you distinguished from the monkeys is shitposting.
Yes, he is informed, more than enough to make you fall for it.
All of that mathematics is "meaningless" because math is, by default. There is no "logically firm meaningful foundation" and Wildburguer is a retard who didn't realize that mathematics has no bounds with how we and computers execute procedures - always in finite steps. He doesn't even know logic, model theory or set theory.
For pure mathematicians, choosing your logical foundations and axioms is almost like choosing what game you're going to play. Before anything, it's a game.
The relevant questions arise when we debate mundane applications. Despite of not having any solid reason to believe that there is anything infinite in the physical world, we can use analysis emplying concepts regarding infinity to actually build things that work. Why and how? These are questions that should matter for applied mathematicians and physicists.
