/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12583692

41KiB, 512x288, unnamed.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Any good scientific articles that buck the mainstream narratives?

Anonymous Fri 15 Jan 05:58:43 2021 No.12583692 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12585233 >>12585298

I was going to review Dr. Andrew Wakefield's vaccine-autism retracted article/study, but that was published way back in 1999 (was looking for something more recent). Maybe something that debunks or delegitimizes Covid-19 or the vaccine response to it, for example?...

I'm aware of Dr. Andrew Kaufman, but it seems like it is harder and harder for an established medical or science fields professional to go against the conventions of mainstream science or medicine, lest the find themselves pariahs and not able to find employment and pay back educational loans or recoup that investment, etc.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9500320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/
https://www.andrewkaufmanmd.com/

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 15 Jan 2021 16:47:49 No.12585223 Report

Quoted By:

i think the best possible link to autism is the possibilty of the mercury poisoning.
dont remember why but very few people are unable to remove thimerosal from their body.
this video is makes a pretty good, albeit anecdotal argument: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZnCLPq40gY&t=0

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 15 Jan 2021 16:50:44 No.12585233 Report

Quoted By:

>>12583692
>Any good scientific articles that buck the mainstream narratives
Confirmation bias much?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 15 Jan 2021 17:06:37 No.12585298 Report

Quoted By:

>>12583692
>Maybe something that debunks or delegitimizes Covid-19 or the vaccine response to it
So it's about a one-sided treatment of biomedical research in support of your anti-vax movement?
>to go against the conventions of mainstream science or medicine
It's easier to claim that some people are conspiring against you rather than admitting to yourself and others that your research was simply sloppy.

In case of Dr. Andrew Wakefield's article, the methology was flawed, the same method would have yielded in similar correlations between vaccines and any X without proof of any causal relationship between the two, the study couldn't be reproduced etc.

Regardless of Dr. Andrew Kaufman's actual research. The vaccine-autism link was and still is a convenient excuse for parents to explain away their children's bizarre or stupid behavior instead of admitting that they suck at parenting, have emotionally abused the child or simply have shitty genes.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches