>>12576314>no its not, that's retardedWhy?
>compression algorithms, which can replicate something perfectlyThat's wrong, you can't compress without losing information. That's the whole point of compression algorithms - truncate the parts that yield miniscule amounts of information. The effects I mentioned cannot stem from compression.
>rest
You still don't get it. The fractional quantum hall effect is a local thing that we can observe in full form. We don't just see a small part of it and the rest isn't "rendered". It's there, and we know it can't be simulated without infinite energy or closed timelike curves.
>>12576317>when have you actually used pi or e rather than some shorthand simulated estimation of it?Literally yesterday. Relative phase in quantum computers can be any real number, pi is trivial.
>Then in what capacity is the computer based on actual physics rather than binary logic?It doesn't matter, as long as it's based on SOME aspect of physics, the argument holds. It has to be universal, obviously, but that's true for a lot of computing devices.
