98KiB, 900x900, C1D57ACA-8DF2-4416-B8DE-FFCBEC5E193A.jpg View SameGoogleiqdbSauceNAO Anonymous Tue 12 Jan 20:43:21 2021 No.12573599 ViewReplyOriginalReport Quoted By: >>12573615 >>12573618 >>12573619 >>12574146 If we have no proof for or against something should the default assumption be that it's true or false? Why? Can't these two be made to mean the same thing, like saying "it's true that x is fake" is equivalent to "it's false that x exists".