>>12567215It would remain necessary to reject him, even and especially in that circumstance. This is why Godel's proof and Aquinas, pascal et al's arguments are meaningless, because in adition to being wrong, even if they were right they would be immaterial.
>>12567255However even I must observe that this is a redit :^)-tier argument found in the first few pages of teh Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy, you should be ashamed of yourself for thinking that it would be effective.
