>>12566150lmao, no. Skylon was projected by its own creators to achieve ~$2000/kg payload to orbit, or roughly expendable Falcon Heavy launch economics.
Skylon would not be able to get by without significant refurb every flight, due to its insanely low dry mass (which would require meme materials that we don't have btw).
Skylon on paper has a 20 ton payload and can only get to LEO, so basically Shuttle but more delicate.
Also, Skylon is not an air launch rocket, it's a fucking SSTO, and it does not have the performance margins to fly around weather systems before adopting an accelerate-to-orbit profile.
Skylon does not exist. Skylon's engines do not exist. Only the precooler for Skylon's engines has been developed so far.
