>>12561676http://www.circlist.com/styles/page1.htmlThis stood out
"Frenulum removal
Irrespective of the choices made in respect of the high/low and loose/tight variables, the question arises of whether to remove or retain the frenulum, the web of tissue connecting the underneath of the glans to the inner foreskin.
This an extremely sensitive area, but the nerves are not in the frenulum, they reside in the glans below it. The sensitivity remains after removal of the frenulum. There are two caveats here. One is that a particularly thick or restrictive frenulum may prevent adequate stimulation. The other is that a thick scar from frenulum removal may have the same effect. When a 'low and tight' circumcision is done the remaining skin can be trimmed to a 'V' which will fit the space where the frenulum was. This gives smooth skin over the sensitive area and optimal sensitivity.
Note also that, when circumcision takes place in infancy, it is difficult to predict the outcome as regards the frenulum. In the newborn, it is not well developed. Even if it is retained, it may fail to develop further after circumcision."
I don't know whether that area is still sensitive for cut men, but most of the sensation actually comes from structures in the rigid band. The very tip of the foreskin on the underside is probably the most sensitive part of the body, maybe second only to the lips at the corners of the mouth. It's only pleasurable when the foreskin is pulled back. Therefore it's seemingly a lie that the nerves are "under" the frenulum and somehow relate with the glans. They want to give the impression that they're getting the foreskin etc out of the way. The nerves definitely are in the frenulum.
