>>12552180From left to right, top to bottom:
>self-explanatory>it's just a generic "nerdy" depiction? this one means nothing>IIRC Plankton is insane and mentally unstable, so it checks out>I have no idea what the image is depicting>yeah, popsci loves to suck number theorists' dicks, muh prime numbers>my interpretation is that this depicts how fucking impossible it is to prove any solid (new) theorems in PDE theory>looks like a contour plot of a complex function>I don't get this one. "Everything is just solved by gradient descent", maybe?>I guess the idea is that combinatorics is just babby's first math?>yes, algebraic topologists should be institutionalized, all they do is draw cochain complexes and MV sequences and pretend that these arrows prove anything>self-explanatory>self-explanatory>category theory is just autofellatio, yes>I honestly don't even know what dynamical systems precisely means>self-explanatory>I'm assuming this is referring to how his arms look like a plot of a real function? But that's retarded as fuck because that's barely what functional analysis is about - FA is about normed vector spaces and linear maps between them. Person clearly has no idea what FA is and only looked at the word "functional" 
