>>12534520>>12534522Still no evidence. I don't have to post scientific proof of an alternative; the burden of proof is on you. You can say that the universe is shaped like a cupcake, but I won't believe it unless you can prove it
>>12534522If even a child can do an experiment to prove gravity, surely you can tell me what it was so I can do it for myself then?
Oh, and I bet you thought you were so cute for your little giggle about CERN. CERN is arguably the greatest threat to science in the 21st century.
CERN's business model is to build massive, useless rube goldberg contraptions, post pictures of a random dot and say this justifies another hundred billion in funding, on top of actually using money to crack down on organised criticism of the scientific "concensus" orchestrated by a whole host of unsavoury individuals with stakes in keeping the public obedient. There's more proof of CERN being a fraudulent, money-laundering cult than there is for any science that CERN has ever produced
