TL;DR
Oil is a renewable resource, right?
---
When I was in high school and learning about energy sources from a libtard short haired stained teeth eco-freak teacher and she had us do reports on renewable vs non-renewable resources. I asked why
She told me "oil and coal are non-renewable because it takes thousands of years to make during the time of the dinosaurs."
when I replied "But isn't today 'thousands of years' from some other point in time?" She claimed that was flawed logic but I used her previous example of wood and said "wood is a renewable resource because we can plant them and then harvest them later. Isn't that the same time concept, the timeframe is just drastically longer?"
She got peeved I even questioned it and told me to look at the textbook after which she said "Oil was created the earth was different, at the rate we are using it we will run out- thus its non-renewable"
I remember this convo very clearly because it was when I started to question textbooks and "undisputed science". She also treated me differently for the rest of the year.
Years went by and I never thought of that moment, because most of what we learn in school is useless in the real world. But then I saw the image above shared on /pol/ as an argument for jews ruining textbooks to fit their plans for the future i.e. pushing natural gas. All these alternative energy sources are pretty bad for the environment. Turbine blades need to be replaced and buried because they aren't recyclable. Tidal contraptions kill native animals. Solar takes massive amounts of water to produce and also has bad chemical bi-products from manufacturing.
What else did science textbooks lie to us about? Seems a lot of these diets were off like the low fat diets that actually made people fatter.
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/have-low-fat-diets-made-us-fatter/
Food science is circling back to islamic/jewish ways of making, handling and consuming of food as the healthiest.
Oil is a renewable resource, right?
---
When I was in high school and learning about energy sources from a libtard short haired stained teeth eco-freak teacher and she had us do reports on renewable vs non-renewable resources. I asked why
She told me "oil and coal are non-renewable because it takes thousands of years to make during the time of the dinosaurs."
when I replied "But isn't today 'thousands of years' from some other point in time?" She claimed that was flawed logic but I used her previous example of wood and said "wood is a renewable resource because we can plant them and then harvest them later. Isn't that the same time concept, the timeframe is just drastically longer?"
She got peeved I even questioned it and told me to look at the textbook after which she said "Oil was created the earth was different, at the rate we are using it we will run out- thus its non-renewable"
I remember this convo very clearly because it was when I started to question textbooks and "undisputed science". She also treated me differently for the rest of the year.
Years went by and I never thought of that moment, because most of what we learn in school is useless in the real world. But then I saw the image above shared on /pol/ as an argument for jews ruining textbooks to fit their plans for the future i.e. pushing natural gas. All these alternative energy sources are pretty bad for the environment. Turbine blades need to be replaced and buried because they aren't recyclable. Tidal contraptions kill native animals. Solar takes massive amounts of water to produce and also has bad chemical bi-products from manufacturing.
What else did science textbooks lie to us about? Seems a lot of these diets were off like the low fat diets that actually made people fatter.
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph-in-the-news/have-low-fat-diets-made-us-fatter/
Food science is circling back to islamic/jewish ways of making, handling and consuming of food as the healthiest.
